Finally, after two episodes lost, I managed to come away with me to see , the well-known program Fabio Fazio and Roberto Saviano, incensed by several parties as a symbol of quality TV, which is responsible for informing and culture. On hearing this honey come to my ears, at first glance I could not make but think that Fazio, after which time He had succeeded in another company: bringing in a prime-quality program, with a graceful style and show little inclination to an end in itself.
Indeed Come away with me is what I wrote in the previous rows, but with some exceptions.
First, I would like to know where all the culture of which they speak. Be understanding and explain to me: read the lists (in most cases by the author and not the guests more or less authoritative speakers) would be to culture?
I can understand (and I appreciated) Saviano's monologues on the Mafia, although some have taken the corner too, as Roberto Maroni has shown. However, in principle, the author of Gomorrah his does, he does so well.
lists ... But heck, three quarters of the transmission consists of reading lists, the content of pathetic and obvious indeed, and makes you want to go read a litany of phrases that you do in two minutes flat amounts to a cultural diffusion?
to say nothing of the readers. It is true stroke of genius (listen to Renzo Piano's always a pleasure) to some very rational choice (the Congolese political refugee, which was introduced without even explaining the situation in the Congo) to real choices in bad taste (the sister of Stephen Cucchi. Incidentally, I'm not saying that of Cucchi is an end just and deserved, I believe that cases like his should never happen, but reading a wild range of benefits of a drug addict in the early evening I do not think a good scene).
I expected that there was a clear political coloration, though it already on Rai Tre should have been suspicious. Suspicions confirmed: to talk about (sorry, reading lists on) the rights of women called Emma Bonino, Susanna Camusso and Laura Morante. Maybe, but my choices seem somewhat biased, partisan as the contents of their readings.
to promote full marks instead Corrado Guzzanti, caustic and cynical as ever. His sketch, along with Saviano's monologue about the relationship between the Mafia and garbage , is certainly the best part successful transmission.
In closing, I do not understand all the noise made around this program. Makes information? It was also fairly well. Maintains? Yes, with rhythms and modes other than the classical concept, but manages to do that too. Fa culture? No. Where is the culture? Bonino's List?
makes you think? Only Saviano, the rest is something of a vacuum.
How are the wires? The writer juggles well even though now it seems to me a prisoner of the person who has been created after the worldwide success of Gomorrah, Fazio is the usual cooked pear which is also the figure of chocolate in front of the interior minister. This program
I think the version 2.0 of Speaker's Corner of Hyde Park, with the difference that here about those who go to the genius of the authors (rightly, but not shareability) and you say what you mean, that most of the time seeks the trivialization and excessive dramatization of issues that all states have (such as the stone figures on murders in the prisons, as if only happen in Italy and made clear how these despicable).
As you may have guessed from the content of the post, a program to fail to (almost) the whole line. Is talked about only because in Italy there is a similar program that makes (or tries to) culture, at least on free TV.
0 comments:
Post a Comment